Ava’s 30 days
The whole report a parent gets, for one illustrative month. She started fast and careless, which is a very common pattern, and the charts below are how you would watch that change.
Sample data · Ava is an illustrative student, not a real one
Where the difficulty went, day by day
Line: Milu’s estimate of her levelShaded band: difficulty range served that day
Look at day 17. After three hard days in a row, Milu eased the difficulty back on its own. Four days later it started climbing again.
Score held steady while the questions got harder
Both lines share one 0–100 scale, so the gap between them is real. A flat score against a rising difficulty line is improvement — it is the single most useful thing on this page.
Score (% correct)Question difficulty
What happened: their raw score only moved 16 points, but Milu was feeding them steadily harder questions the whole month. Scored against day-1 material, they’d be near the top of the range.
They stopped needing the extra time
Average seconds per question, against the pace a real exam demands.
Rushing errors fell. Knowledge gaps didn’t.
Wrong answers split by how long they spent before answering.
Answered fast, got it wrongAnswered slowly, got it wrong
One test, second by second
Every question on day 12, in the order they answered them. This is the chart that tells you which problem a student has.
The pattern: they sank four minutes into question 7, then had to sprint the last three in under 45 seconds each — and missed two of them. They didn’t fail on knowledge. They failed on triage. That is a coachable habit, and it is invisible on a score report.
Where they stand by subject
Milu’s running estimate of their level, 0–100, per section.